Posts

  • , ,

    The hope of seeds and gardens

    Published by

    on

    I’m sitting in the Centretown condo of my good friend Élizabeth Powles. Outside are signs of construction and autumn. Inside are her loudly purring cat and what she describes as a fuck-ton of common milkweed seeds. (I correctly guess the size of the container they fill: 8 cups.)

    Our plan is to pack seeds, a heaping eighth of a teaspoon at a time, into the paper envelopes she already folded, for distribution by the Ottawa Wildflower Seed Library. Scoop, insert, fold, tape closed with explanatory label, repeat. It is useful work to do with your hands while watching TV or chatting about nature and art and community and the future.

    The back of an unused seed envelope. There is an intricate black and white line drawing, with maybe castles and produce and most of an angel.
    An envelope with the scientific names of Common Milkweed and information about sun, moisture, bloom, and sowing.

    The Butterfly Meadow, generating seeds

    As one aspect of her volunteer work, Élizabeth now runs the Butterfly Meadow in the Fletcher Wildlife Garden (near Dow’s Lake in Ottawa). She chose to run the meadow as a drop-in, so that volunteers who have a bit of time during the season can show up and do some weeding or hauling or whatever needs to be done. “The intention is to be accessible for anybody who doesn’t know what the hell they’re doing and doesn’t have a lot of time.”

    The goal of the meadow itself, she says, “is to demonstrate, if you have a big rural lot, what you might want to do with that land. It’s not managed-managed like a backyard garden would be. It runs semi-wild, but we have paths and we intentionally planted a lot of native plants, but they’re kind of all over the place, and there are still a lot of invasive plants.” This includes her eternal nemesis, Dog-Strangling Vine.

    “There’s so much less than there was, there’s areas where there’s hardly any, where you can really see the impact that we’ve made, so that’s really satisfying, but again that only works because we’re managing [invasive plants] every single year and we’ll have to keep managing it indefinitely or it will all just go back to the way it was. But I’m okay with that because it’s a very harmonious job. I love just having a reason to be out there in the sunshine and it’s great exercise and all the plants smell really nice and there’s the earth and the green things and you hear the birds singing and it’s lovely and I’m very happy to spend as much time as I can possibly squeeze out in the summer working away.”

    This is her first year volunteering with the Ottawa Wildflower Seed Library as well as the Butterfly Meadow. Élizabeth had originally been interested in the idea of guerrilla gardening (planting flowers or edible plants in neglected private or public spaces), but it turns out the germination rate is low. Then she attended a workshop for making seed envelopes.

    “We sat around, a big group of people at the community centre, and we just folded seed envelopes and it was very soothing. You just sit there and do something kind of rote with your hands, but talk to a bunch of like-minded pleasant people and feel like you’re doing something useful and it’s lovely.”

    Next up was a seed-packing workshop, and it occurred to her that the Butterfly Meadow is effectively a seed orchard (where native plants are grown and can be harvested for seed for restoration projects). She’s already planning to use the seed library’s four-tier priority list to fill up some bare patches next year, so the meadow can generate the native seeds that are needed most.

    “Some plants have hyper-abundant, easy-to-collect seeds and those ones very quickly the seed library is like ‘we have enough, thank you.’ Other seeds will always be high priority because they’re more rare, they’re harder to collect, etc.” Milkweed, she says, is highly valued because it supports monarch butterflies.

    The technology and art of seed envelopes

    We talk about the concept of technology, how to some it means only shiny engineered gadgets with moving parts, like the energy-intensive air conditioning that becomes a necessity when you build a giant glass tower in a desert. Élizabeth instead conceives of technology as “information applied in an appropriate way,” such as “a building that’s essentially self-cooling because it’s modelled on termite mounds,” or other types of thoughtful design with lessons learned from nature.

    We talk about solarpunk, a genre of science fiction and a style of art and a social movement about sustainability and finding a balance between nature and technology. “People who don’t think of themselves as science fiction people are putting out ideas for sustainable building practices, sustainable urban planning and urban design, and yes, okay, that’s all solarpunk. [And] a lot of people create art that’s like the cities you’d like to see in the future – idealized cities where it’s clearly high tech but there’s also a ton of greenery incorporated, for a sustainable green city. None of this ‘we’re going back to the stone age because that’s the only way we can save the earth,’ it’s sort of accepting that technology is here to stay, and offers a lot of benefits, but we have to use it wisely.”

    Solarpunk, she says, is about “a better society, decapitalism-izing society, and better community bonds and low consumption.” Plants in particular are “gloriously anticapitalist. They make their own food, they do their own thing, and they produce, like, 50 million times more propagules than they actually need for replacement, so they’re just ‘here is some food’ for all the wildlife and the people who want to share seeds.” (A propagule, she explains, is a plant term for anything that propagates a plant, such as a seed or a cutting.)

    The seed envelopes themselves are low tech and efficient. Each is a little square of paper folded in such a way that there is a pocket for seeds, and each gets taped shut with the relevant explanatory label printed off the seed library’s website.

    The envelopes we’re packing are also art, because they’re made out of paper left over from Élizabeth’s surreal but naturalistic collaging projects.

    Resized 20240526 110148
    Resized 20240526 125943
    Resized 20240526 160829

    “I cut up so many books for collaging and used the leftover paper for seed envelopes. A lot of them were art books or nature books – the paper that’s left over was actually very pretty – so as I was folding the seed envelopes I was looking at them and thinking ‘ooh ooh, let’s make the prettiest side available to the person who gets the seeds, it’ll be cute, it’ll be a little bonus!’”

    I packed envelopes that were medieval line drawings; paintings, dark or colourful; short, inscrutable passages of text; sheet music. The seed envelopes don’t have to be beautiful to perform their propagation function, but a little extra art in a gloomy world doesn’t hurt.

    Doing what you can do

    All told, we pack 504 envelopes with common milkweed seeds for the Ottawa Wildflower Seed Library.

    These and other types of native seeds will be given away for free at in-person events in November and December, and what is left over can be ordered for mail-out starting in late December.

    A plastic container full of 504 seed envelopes. Most are bundled into packets of 20, and then 4 sit loose on top.

    “There’s ultimately 8 billion people in the world and it’s not on you to do 8 billion people’s worth of work to save everything,” Élizabeth says. “I cannot control the world, I can’t control human nature, but what I can do is whatever little small things I can that will make a small amount of positive change. Yes, we’re trying to put more native plants out into the world, but one of the side benefits of this is to support this notion of communal endeavours, working together on a thing, and I do think that stuff is contagious. There are people out there who may be feeling woeful, and looking for something that they can latch onto, and this could be something good that they can latch onto.”

    504 little artful, joyful, anti-capitalist bundles of hope for a future with more butterflies.

    Volunteering at the Fletcher Wildlife Gardens


  • ,

    Minor campaigns

    Published by

    on

    Sometimes I do minor freelance proofreading / shit-disturbing. Some recent examples:

    1. Équiterre

    Équiterre posted a job listing recently that failed to disclose up front (1) salary range and (2) remote / in-office expectations. I told them this is a bad look for a progressive org.

    (1) Posting the salary range up front is important for accountability and fair pay, particularly in the non-profit sector where salaries are lower and a higher percentage of employees belong to historically underpaid demographics.

    (2) It is a significant contractual issue how much time employees will be expected to donate to commuting to the office when they can do their work from home. An environmental organization in particular should be transparent about the carbon costs of the job.

    Any employer that intends to treat its employees fairly should include this information upfront. A social justice organization should not have made this mistake in the first place.

    Their entire response was that they transferred my email to human resources. They managed to get my name wrong in doing so.

    2. Dropout TV

    Dropout is an online streaming service with lots of unique nerdy / silly content.

    Their recent “What’s on Dropout” ad bragged about their service in comparison to others (like Netflix): “no ads,” “no disappearing content,” and, at 2:28, “yes password sharing.”

    Section 2.2 of Dropout’s Terms of Service begins: “You may not share your Account login or password with anyone.”

    This is a pretty blatant legal fuckup. I asked them which is correct.

    A couple emails and nearly a month later, I still don’t have an answer.

    3. Women’s Legal Education and Action Fund

    LEAF‘s latest newsletter contained the phrase “women and trans people” (version française: “Les femmes et les personnes trans”).

    I have asked them to clarify if LEAF thinks trans women don’t count as women.

    I honestly don’t know if it was unfortunate language or some sort of compromise for TERFs.

    23 October 2024: I had a private comment that reminded me why I don’t like Wikipedia, so here is my own understanding of TERFs:

    TERFs – trans-exclusionary radical feminists – are “radical feminists” who want to exclude trans people from the word “women.” Basically they seem to think their experience of womanhood is special and unique – sometimes it’s about the sacred mother, sometimes it’s about sexual violence – and they’re obsessed with excluding anyone who grew up under societally imposed male gender norms. This seems to be because they think anyone who was raised male benefitted from patriarchy, which is the enemy. Maybe they accept trans women in the broader fight against the patriarchy, maybe they don’t, but these “radical feminists” seem to want their higher status in the hierarchy preserved. It reminds me of early arguments against same-sex marriage, where some people would say lesbian and gay couples could have some lesser form of recognition, but “marriage” was their sacred straight experience.

    I understand the trans woman response to TERFs to include that the experience of being raised male was generally miserable / dysphoric, and that being a woman cannot be reduced to just sex organs. Different people can (obviously, necessarily) have different experiences of being a woman. The category “woman” includes both trans women and cis women. This doesn’t detract from anyone else’s experience, it just means you have more sisters in the fight.

    My feminism could maybe be described as radical, but I don’t agree with excluding people who are different from me. I think it’s important to focus on the real problem and punch *up*, which is not at trans people. TERFs represent, to me, another example of language and law being used to exclude people, so I’m hoping this was just awkward language on LEAF’s part.

    24 October 2024:

    LEAF: “I do not believe it was the intent for those identities to be read as mutually exclusive, but on the contrary to be inclusive of all transgender people regardless of their gender identities.”

    Me: “Okay, thanks. It was a complicated sentence and I’m glad to hear the intent was to be more inclusive.

    I would flag that particular wording for LEAF to consider avoiding in the future, though, since there is a school of feminism that uses it deliberately to exclude.”


  • , ,

    How many ineffective roads must a union walk down…

    Published by

    on

    My former union now thinks the solution to the federal government’s three-days-in-office policy is to request that Parliament study the matter.

    Presumably the reasoning is that the federal court process is taking too long and maybe a minority Parliament overflowing with hostility would move faster.

    I can’t say I’m optimistic about this after more than a decade of working with Parliamentary committees and trying to get the executive to promptly fix shit they fucked up.

    The union’s letter

    The letter from the union sets out the issues it wants investigated Parliamentarily:

    1. Insufficient Workspaces: There is a lack of available desks and workspaces, leading to overcrowding.
    2. Health and Safety Violations: Many desks and offices are dirty, and the overall air quality is poor, contributing to unsanitary conditions.
    3. Privacy Concerns from Unprecedented Surveillance Measures: The introduction of new surveillance measures that potentially encroach on employees’ privacy and distract managers from critical project management tasks, shifting focus away from more important responsibilities.
    4. Noisy Office Environment: The noise levels in the office are disruptive, with few quiet spaces for focused work. The busy atmosphere makes it difficult for employees to concentrate, further exacerbating the challenges of productivity.
    5. Inadequate Equipment: The current hotelling system limits access to necessary equipment, such as monitors and ergonomic setups, hindering employee comfort and efficiency.
    6. Limited Meeting and Collaboration Spaces: There is a shortage of meeting rooms and collaborative areas, which restricts in-person teamwork.
    7. Insufficient Lockers: There are not enough lockers available, and those that exist are often too small to accommodate personal belongings.
    8. Impact on Stress and Anxiety: Employees frequently experience stress and anxiety due to the struggle to find workspace, unreliable booking systems, and a general lack of resources.
    9. Work-Life Imbalance: These conditions contribute to an unhealthy work-life balance for employees.
    10. Employee Morale: Overall, the current working conditions have a negative impact on employee morale, further affecting our workplace culture.

    No wonder so many of the federally employed people I love seem on the verge of burnout and breakdown.

    I don’t know how the union concluded the solution to all of this is for federal employees to patiently endure life-draining exploitation including health and safety violations and unprecedented surveillance measures while it tries a different path for submitting a polite request to the apathetic people who created this system that they please give a shit.

    (There is not a single word in the letter about COVID, despite the fact that the most recent forecast shows 1 out of every 38 Canadians currently infected, and poor air quality increases the risk of infection from this potentially disabling disease. I think that’s shameful.)

    The Parliamentary vehicle

    1. Mandate debate?

    The letter is addressed to the Clerk of the Standing Committee on Government Operations and Estimates (OGGO). Here’s what seems most relevant from that Committee’s mandate:

    The mandate of the Standing Committee on Government Operations and Estimates focuses on the estimates process as well as on the effectiveness and proper functioning of government operations.

    Pursuant to Standing Order 108(3)(c), the Committee’s mandate includes … the study of … the effectiveness, management, and expenditure plans of:

    • central departments and agencies;
    • new information and communication technologies adopted by the government;
    • cross-departmental mandates, including programs delivered by more than one department or agency; [and]
    • Crown corporations and agencies that have not been specifically referred to another standing committee….

    Among the 21 organizations the Committee is explicitly mandated to study is the “Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat,” which I understand to be where this shitshow originated.

    But then CBC reports this quote from Treasury Board of Canada president Anita Anand that seems to suggest a “beyond the scope” argument.

    In response…, Treasury Board of Canada president Anita Anand said the return-to-office decision was an administrative one and not political. 

    “This administrative decision was made by the Treasury Board Secretariat, in collaboration with the Privy Council Office and deputy ministers across government, who support this change,” she said in a French-language statement to Radio-Canada.

    I don’t know if it’s correct to suggest that OGGO’s authority extends only to political decisions, not administrative ones. My former union seems to think there is precedent for this type of study: “OGGO is the same committee that investigated past failures on behalf of the employer, including the changeover of the public sector health care plan from Sun Life to Canada Life as part of its mandate.”

    But the precise scope of OGGO’s mandate could be irrelevant anyway. I’ve attended committee meetings where an official ruling on scope was overturned by Parliamentarians voting per party instructions.

    Everything is political.

    2. Timing and outcome of previous studies

    Let’s assume that OGGO decides to take up this investigation. The questions I want answered next are “How quickly does this committee tend to go from idea to report?” and “What is the likely outcome anyway?”

    Let’s use the public sector health care plan report cited by my former union as an example.

    28 September 2023: the Committee begins to discuss studying the issue.

    17 October 2023: the Committee votes to study the issue.

    7 December 2023: the Committee hears from witnesses from Public Works, the Treasury Board Secretariat, and Canada Life.

    26 February 2024: the Committee hears from one union (PSAC).

    22 May 2024: the Committee considers a draft report.

    3 June 2024: the Committee’s report is tabled in the House of Commons; it includes nine recommendations and requests that the government table a “comprehensive response” to the report.

    1 October 2024: the government presents its response in the form of a letter from The Honourable Anita Anand, PC, MP, President of the Treasury Board.

    I actually think a year between motion and government response is quick as far as a committee study is concerned. But even assuming Parliament doesn’t implode and reconstitute somewhere between A Handmaid’s Tale and The Purge, it would still be another year of employees commuting and deteriorating, for recommendations.

    I do not read that government response and conclude “yes, this process will get employees prompt, humane results.”

    Playing your strengths

    The strength that employees have comes from their unity and their labour.

    I don’t see how unions expect to win if their approach is for employees to comply to their own detriment with ten enumerated types of harm while the narrow processes the federal government set up to its own advantage play out slowly.

    I do see how unions could win if they encourage employees, en masse, to stop volunteering their free time to commuting. An unnecessary commute could be additional paid hours, or it could be hours deducted from the contracted work week, or it could simply not happen. The costs of a policy imposed unilaterally by the employer must be borne by the employer, not subsidized by employees.

    This is not time and health that employees will ever be able to get back.

    Anita Anand could write a government response to a committee report in her sleep. It is time for unions to wake her up with immediate financial and productivity consequences.


  • ,

    Safe Spaces

    Published by

    on

    You’d think we’d want safe spaces for ourselves and others.

    It seems to me that should be universally aspirational, maybe even a government priority or a constitutional minimum or a biological imperative or something.

    Instead, people who ask and push for safe spaces are called snowflakes and worse.

    We’re often told we’re not worth the effort, at least by governments, employers, corporations, relatives, and religions. We start to think we don’t deserve to be safe. Sometimes we get mad at anyone who has the audacity to think that they do.

    I should be clear that I write this from a space of comfort, within my control and budget. As far as spaces in a capitalist / ableist / sexist / increasingly militaristic society go, it is quite safe.

    I’m trying to push myself to venture outside of my safe space more, physically and otherwise.

    But I’m also getting better at recognizing when my nervous system is approaching a problem and it’s time to retreat to my safe space and recharge. Regulate. Figure out the next step.

    We all deserve the time and support and safe space for that.

    Why would anyone not want that?

    Please enjoy this video of a parrot that has found a safe space to be its authentic self:


  • , ,

    A Climate of Community

    Published by

    on

    A recurring theme in the news lately is capitalism-aggravated climate disasters that devastate people and regions.

    Capitalist governments are unwilling to mitigate climate disasters and unable to respond to the need caused. There is too much. Responders, care workers in general, are underpaid and exhausted and disheartened.

    Infrastructure — weakened by years, maybe decades of neglect by capitalist governments — is costly to repair, especially if the goal is to withstand extreme heat and drought and ice storms and hurricanes and tornadoes and floods. But usually the goal is just to get it done as cheaply as possible; someone else can pay when it fails.

    It’s hard to feel optimistic against these facts.

    I read a lot of science fiction and try to think about what I need to learn to be more useful in community. I’ve come up with skills like learning to grow and prepare and not waste food. Learning to repurpose and repair rather than replace. Learning to resolve interpersonal conflicts. These are not skills this particular society prioritizes, to our detriment.

    Recently I read that amateur radio can be useful to help people connect in disaster zones when other channels have failed. I’m drawn to the idea of getting a licence myself, and with it my own call sign (!). Maybe I’ll even learn Morse Code.

    That feels like a more hopeful approach to the current dystopia than each individual unit buying their own personal generator. It also feels like a more realistic approach than expecting rescue from governments that repeatedly leave people behind.