-
Langue
Published by
on
Je le trouve beaucoup plus facile d’écrire en anglais, mais évidemment il y a question de pratique.
J’ai aussi quelques plaintes pertinentes. Premièrement, le français que le système anglophone m’a enseigné était celui de France, beaucoup moins utile en l’occurrence que ça aurait pu être. Deuxièmement, on admettait théoriquement l’existence des versions féminines des mots mais on ne les utilisaient jamais, alors existaient-elles vraiment?
J’apprécie les développements linguistiques comme iel(s) comme défaut quand on n’a aucun raison valable de choisir entre “il” et “elle.” L’inclusivité comme pratique, au lieu de choisir toujours le masculin “générique.”
Mais il y a des gens qui s’y opposent, pour la plupart j’imagine des gens qui se voient clairement dans le masculin générique. Qui ne comprennent pas ce que c’est de ne se voir représentée que rarement (et rudement). Qui trouvent qu’une demande d’inclure les autres leur prive des droits ou de statut.
Ça me semble limité comme réponse. Il y a toute une expérience humaine qui ne devrait pas être soumise au masculin générique. Ce serait plus intéressant pour tout le monde.
-
“Professional”
Published by
on
I made this website for “professional” posts, but one of the problems I’ve encountered is how “professional” in practice means “not actually human.”
Having feelings that affect your performance? Unprofessional.
Having responsibilities that mean you’re not available 24-7? Possibly a fireable offence in today’s “dynamic” workplaces.
Having literal human needs like warmth and relief from warmth and food and water and time to use the bathroom and to sleep? Begrudgingly permitted, if you’re lucky, but often resented and micro-managed. If you’re unlucky, you might wear a diaper to work and/or die from heat exhaustion.
This is not okay. I don’t want to be “business as usual” in a society that thinks this is okay. I want my humanity recognized, and everybody else’s too.
So part of what I want to do here is push back against the norm that I have to suppress that humanity in order to be taken seriously. Sometimes I will say things that are considered “unprofessional” by the cis-het white Christian dude standards that govern us. Sometimes I will swear in frustration or for emphasis or even just for style. I would suggest that if we’re more alarmed by this than by a world that is literally on fire then our priorities need reconsideration.
The more we deny the human experience, the worse the world becomes. I am aiming for the opposite. I invite other “professionals” to join me.
-
A financial post
Published by
on
I feel like sharing a couple articles today, both quite focused on money.
The first, about “Return to Office” policies, supports my argument that commute time should be paid work. Some highlights:
Most companies cannot show actual monetary benefits from RTO mandates. But most employees can show actual and significant monetary costs from RTO mandates.
In essence, these kinds of mandates represent a transfer of wealth from employees that their employers don’t even benefit from. …
The result: a slow bleeding of high-performing employees, millennials and women.
In other words, to impose RTO is to implement a policy of gradually reduced overall employee performance, increased difficulty in meeting gender inclusion goals and undermined efforts to groom the next generation of corporate leaders.
https://www.computerworld.com/article/3712843/the-hidden-high-cost-of-return-to-office-mandates.htmlThis seems to me like something unions should be making a much bigger stink about, not just for the quantifiable financial cost to employees, but also for the time and environmental and health costs too.
The second article, about environmentally destructive Canadian pension plan investments, supports the impression I formed recently that many financial people are basing their projections on historical trends rather than on the future we can actually expect. This article persuasively describes this as a failure in fiduciary duty:
The second edition of [Shift Action’s] Canadian Pension Climate Report Card notes that while some pensions made very modest improvements over the previous year, on the whole, Canadian pensions continue to act as if the climate crisis isn’t happening, and as though their considerable investments in the fossil fuel sector weren’t exacerbating the crisis.
The report notes that even though 2023 was the hottest year on record, Canadian pension managers have not responded appropriately. By not aligning investments with “safe emissions pathways and implementing credible climate plans,” pensions are failing at their fiduciary duties to protect their plan members, especially the youngest cohort of contributors. …
The report further notes that the Canada Pension Plan Investment Board (CPPIB) — the crown corporation that oversees and manages the Canada Pension Plan — continues to make questionable investments in fossil fuels. Shift Action found a considerable disconnect between statements made by CPPIB executives about the urgency to act on climate change, and the fund’s continued support of the fossil fuel sector. The CPPIB has also repeated industry talking points, such as “Canada has a reputation for responsibly-produced energy” despite considerable evidence to the contrary.
Close relationships between pension fund managers and the fossil fuel sector are also a cause for concern. “We see directors of pensions also sitting on the boards of fossil fuel companies, creating an unacceptable risk for conflicts of interest,” said [Adam Scott, Shift Action’s executive director].
https://www.desmog.com/2024/02/29/canadian-pension-funds-havent-kept-up-with-financial-r isks-of-climate-change-shift-action-report-finds/It seems to me that the concept of retiring on a pension to enjoy life is an absolute pipe dream for all but the oldest and wealthiest if we don’t start getting leaders who care more about people and the planet than about wealth and power.
It’s good to hear money-focused people starting to share this viewpoint.
-
A profile of Auchtorok, who is DJing tonight at Ten Toes on Somerset
Published by
on
Local artist and musician Auchtorok was trying to think of a romantic installation he could do for Valentine’s Day.
He wanted it to involve a one-player video game where two players held hands and each did half of the work. It occurred to him — real name Jon Booth — that not only do most people know how to play Tetris but the game is actually romantic: “We’re just trying to fit things together.”
His creative process starts with considering what tools he can find. “I never think of the idea first because then it’s too hard to make things happen.” In this instance, the available tools included “capacitive” buttons, meaning “when you touch it, you close the circuit.” He painted two bar stools black and drilled a hole in each, and the control buttons he installed were “literally just the top of two bolts.”
Players had to put on a ring – “could’ve been anything, I just thought it was symbolic” – and then by touching the buttons while holding hands, the player on the left could move pieces left and right while the player on the right rotated them. “The idea was, they have to work together to make the line, and if they don’t hold hands the circuit doesn’t get closed.”
Booth has presented his collaborative Tetris installation twice in Ottawa, most recently this past Valentine’s Day at Wicked Wanda’s on Merivale and originally at Nature Nocturne at the Canadian Museum of Nature, where the game was projected high up in the rotunda, so everyone at the bar below could watch. “There was a line all night, so I’d say probably three or four hundred people played it.”
Most two-player teams at Nature Nocturne got three or four lines at most, Booth said, but one couple did so well he had to ask them to move on so others could take a turn. (Those excellent communicators, it turned out, were in an open relationship.) The worst job of the night went to a guy who was getting so frustrated with his non-gamer girlfriend that he tried to do both halves himself. (The crowd booed.)
Booth’s previous installations have also featured “the idea of taking old things that are familiar and finding a new way to either interact with them or play with them.” One that didn’t work as well as he’d hoped was a two-player competitive game of Snake, where players controlled their snake by balancing on a round tabletop with sensors built into each of the four directions. Unfortunately, one of the “controllers” broke, so the competitive element was lost.
He’s had some luck with Pacman, though. Another installation for Nature Nocturne involved “a contraption where you could play Pacman from the centre of the maze, so you’re standing in the little ghost house in the middle” while the game was projected from above. “So you had to look all around you and on the floor were the different buttons, kind of like a control pad, but you had to use your feet.”
The difference between seeing the game flat in front of you as a player and being immersed in it meant no one passed even the first map, Booth says, although one player came close. “Everyone thought it was going to be easy, and then they’d be looking behind them and their friends would be yelling ‘in front of you, he’s coming, he’s coming!’ People were getting super into it, because you’re really feeling surrounded. So I guess I really wanted to make people feel how terrified Pacman must feel every day of his life. He’s just hungry. He doesn’t know when he goes around the corner. You know, but he doesn’t.”
He tried a different but also chaotic Pacman-related idea for Don Kwan of Shanghai restaurant on Somerset, “but it was outdoors and it was raining so I think I had one person try it all night and packed it up after an hour.” For this one, he layered two active projections of Pacman on top of each other and then it was a race to see which player could clear their maze first. “But the problem is, since the two are totally lined up, you can’t tell which dots you’ve eaten and which dots they’ve eaten so you have to try and remember ‘where have I been.’” He says it was pretty fun, but not the kind of thing people are likely to get good at.
Since losing his job when Orange Art Gallery lost its space at City Centre, Booth has also been focusing more on his music, which he describes as ambient techno. He recently joined Broken Bottle Productions, a label / collective out of Portland, Oregon, and he’s been doing live sets on Fridays on his Youtube channel. Online viewers won’t see him performing, though. “I literally do not have any computer or device modern enough that could handle the load to do that.” Instead, viewers will see a 2- or 3-second clip from an old movie of a woman’s face looking a bit pensive or frustrated, which he converts to black-and-white and slow motion and then loops for his entire set. “It almost looks still but it’s moving just a little bit. It’s just one face for each video. … It’s really not about watching, it’s about listening.”
His music is also available on his website and on Bandcamp, including “Somewhere Still, Part I,” which he says has been “getting a ridiculous amount of Shazams for a piece that is 45 minutes of ambient music,” and “Rituals,” which was the first track that got attention. “That really was very gratifying because for at least a couple years I thought nothing I did is as good as this. This was just like, I got it. Whatever it is I was looking to do, I did it.”
Auchtorok can be seen at upcoming music gigs in Ottawa, including DJing tonight at Ten Toes on Somerset, his new favourite coffee shop / bar / laundromat. He’ll also be performing his own music at Lounge 164 on March 6, and then DJing again at an art battle on March 9.
He has also applied to participate at the Mutek festival in Montreal this summer, for its 25th anniversary of celebrating electronic music and the digital arts. “I put in for music, but [when we attended last year] there’s projections everywhere, so I made sure in my proposal to put in that I do have visual effects I’d like to add.” His concept this time involves layering old clips of burlesque dancers, manipulated and offset by about half a second so that while the dancers move in slow motion it looks like there’s a red trail or shadow that follows behind them. He hasn’t heard back yet on his application but is hoping to be squeezed in somewhere in the huge, interactive experience that is Mutek. “If I could get in there, I would feel much more legitimate because going there was one of the coolest experiences I’ve ever had.”
|
-
Far from pharmacare
Published by
on
The new federal pharmacare bill has been posted.
I was curious to see how far left the NDP had managed to push the Liberals, and to guess how long it might plausibly be before Canadians start getting even contraception and insulin paid for, much less any other drugs required to live a happy and healthy life.
Having now read the bill, my bet is “years from now, possibly never.” First, there are all the uncertainties and delays to overcome in the legislative process before this bill becomes law. But even assuming it passes, the bill pretty much just creates more work for other people (the Minister of Health, the provinces / territories / Indigenous peoples, the Canadian Drug Agency, the “Committee of Experts”).
The big news provision is s. 6(1), which says no province or territory is getting any money until after it negotiates an agreement with the Minister:
The Minister may, if the Minister has entered into an agreement with a province or territory to do so, make payments to the province or territory in order to increase any existing public pharmacare coverage — and to provide universal, single-payer, first-dollar coverage — for specific prescription drugs and related products intended for contraception or the treatment of diabetes.
Looks to me like it’d be pretty easy for a province to “opt-out” of this scheme, by simply not entering into an agreement with the feds (or perhaps by not having “any existing public pharmacare coverage” in the first place). Maybe some provinces will get an agreement for payments before the election that is likely to result in a health minister who will refuse to negotiate this.
In relation to the creation of “a list of essential prescription drugs and related products,” there is section 8(1), which is a weird combination of precise and vague:
The Minister must, after discussions with the provinces and territories, request that the Canadian Drug Agency prepare, no later than the first anniversary of the day on which this Act receives royal assent, a list of essential prescription drugs and related products to inform the development of a national formulary that will establish the scope of prescription drugs and related products to which Canadians should have access under national universal pharmacare.
The Minister is going to have to those discussions with the provinces and territories very quickly if the Canadian Drug Agency is expected to prepare this list within a year of royal assent. … Unless the Canadian Drug Agency already has a list of “essential prescription drugs and related products” and the discussions with the provinces and territories are a sham.
Regardless, this list of essential prescription drugs is nowhere close to binding law. It will simply “inform the development of a national formulary that will establish the scope of prescription drugs and related products to which Canadians should have access under national universal pharmacare.” When would Canadians have actual access? Given where our governments seem to be heading, I’m guessing never.
If you think I am being pessimistic, I invite you to read subsection 8(2):
The Minister must, after the list referred to in subsection (1) has been prepared, initiate discussions based on the list with provinces, territories, Indigenous peoples and other partners and stakeholders with the aim of continuing to work toward the implementation of national universal pharmacare.
The government doesn’t even bother establishing a timeline for the Minister to “initiate” these discussions. There’s certainly no timeline to conclude them and actually implement national universal pharmacare. Just a vague obligation to talk to stakeholders “with the aim of continuing to work” towards implementation.
Section 9 imposes another challenging timeline on the Canadian Drug Agency, to develop “a national bulk purchasing strategy for prescription drugs and related products” (“in collaboration with partners and stakeholders” and “within a year of royal assent,” but again only after the Minister holds discussions with the provinces and territories). Unlike the “list of essential prescription drugs,” the “national bulk purchasing strategy” doesn’t get a subsection imposing even the wishy-washiest of obligations on the Minister. It’s almost like the government already doesn’t intend to do anything with it.
There’s other fancy-sounding language in the bill too, including a whole string of whereases, a “purpose” section chock-full of buzzwords, lofty principles, and allusions to advice, reports and recommendations. None of this means the actual implementation of national universal pharmacare.
-
-
About the author
CKirkby
- earned degrees in language / literature and law (but is not currently a lawyer or a journalist);
- worked for over a decade on Parliament Hill;
- misses writing; and
- appreciates thoughtful comments, en anglais ou en français. (Email addresses are not published.)
Categories
Archive